thestryker6I gotta agree completely here. I don't know the best answer, but this the world we live in so eh. I'm not saying my theory is failproof, but neither is yours. I don't want to pay $10 for a bag of carrots. So the farmer would need an incentive to grow the carrots, aka our tax payer money pays them what they would have made growing hemp, but they grow carrots instead, win win for everyone. Human nature.I understand where you are coming from and I slightly agree, still, I think land is too valuable, especially as population increases for any farmer to want to invest in carrots, when they could you know grow hemp instead, hemp is a big money maker right now. The problems are at the top where businesses want to pay a select few a larger chunk of the pie instead of the ones that are physically busting their asses to make ends meet. Also, it doesn't help things when farmers are(or were at one time) exempt from paying minimum wage. MentalAcetylideWhich is why I question making farmers and those who work in that industry pay taxes. Posted on Aug 26th 2021, 20:40 Reply #13 Space Lynx Pure 100% capitalism would work, just like any other system, but the problem is human nature, hence the need for checks & balances, which of course due to human nature, will never be perfectly applied either. those carrots, dangit! :roll:Our government is in love with a carrot! :wtf: I seem to recall a similar Wierd Al poetic song containing a line like that. with bags of carrots at 98 cents instead of 10 dollars per bag. take care now.Īlso if you can explain to me how much would carrots cost at the grocery store if our tax payer money did not subsidize agriculture, isn't that anti-free market and anti-capitalist too? yet here we are. Lynx29it is? then how does my state ban scalpers from selling sports game tickets on the sidewalks outside the game? they have banned that for decades where I live. Posted on Aug 26th 2021, 17:10 Reply #11 Space Lynx One First Street N.E., Washington, D.C., 20543Īll 9 sitting justices will agree with me. I will not argue about this because I refuse to argue with communists, socialists or liberals. You have NO RIGHT to use government to force someone out of the market or to not sell at the value he can sell at. #2 If the scalper sells it to a 3rd party, then the 3rd party AGREED to buy at the scalper price.Įither you can a) Not buy from the scalper. #1 If the scalper buys the product, the contract is between him and whoever he buys it from. I'd really like to hear how the OP's idea to have congress regulate that specific commerce is "unconstitutional" either based on the document itself or relevant case law.Īt best, you might be able to point to the work of conservative,activist Supreme Court judges at the turn of the 20th century,but there's nothing inherently permanent about any given instance of judicial review.You should learn more about CONTRACT RIGHTS (Private Contract law). constitution says nothing about a free market or capitalism, in fact, about the only thing in there is the 5th amendment and the government not being able to take private property without due process (eminent domain is considered due process BTW), and the commerce clause which just restricts the states,but not the federal government. And Falls Prey to Scalpers #1 Space LynxĪnarchoPrimitivThe U.S. Jul 14th 2023 Xbox Debuting New Voice Reporting Feature (0)Īdd your own comment 18 Comments on Halo Infinite Limited Edition Xbox Series X Console Announced.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |